|
“Of
course, Parkes has always been exceptional among his generation
in his unflagging pursuit of beauty. The goddess/angel/women in
his paintings are always what in any other hands one would call
impossibly beautiful. “In your dreams, fella!” one might
be tempted to cry. But if the dreamer happens to be called Michael
Parkes, then everything is fine, for he has the total conviction
in his own dreams, backed up by the requisite crystalline sureness
of technique, which enforces belief in the observer. Some call it
Magic Realism, and both parts of the equation apply, in that the
realism of the treatment is undoubtedly dusted with magic.”
“The dreamy boy, enclosed in his own imaginings of fantastic
animals, remote yet erotically potent beauties, moons and stars
and strange celestial manifestations, and the occasional slightly
sinister grotesque, has grown into the man unashamedly ready to
follow his own visionary gleam.”
“The “things” in Parkes’s later paintings
and lithographs go one better. They are not “almost”
anything, but very fully and precisely occupy their own space, even
before Parkes has gone one step further, by taking up sculpture.
The two-dimensional images are already extremely specific. They
could almost be described as photo-realistic, except that they are
of something no one could hope to photograph, in this or any other
world.”
“So who or what are the inhabitants of this strange new world
Parkes leads us graciously into? A beautiful woman is a beautiful
woman, whatever the circumstances, and there are certainly enough
of them in Parkes’s own personal vision. But how many of them
are just beautiful women? Even if they do not have wings or horns,
they seem to come from some Valhalla (many are clearly warrior women,
kin to the Amazons), or maybe from the slopes of Mount Olympus,
where gods and demi-gods engage in the gender arts of music and
dance. Or again, from some obscure corner of the Hindu pantheon,
where supernatural beings may sprout supernumerary limbs without
losing an iota of charm or grace.”
“But these elegant creatures do not live alone in this mysterious
space, somewhere between heaven and earth. There are also strange
male beings, often dressed like a refugee from the commedia dell’arte,
or as a jester or a court dwarf. These make a sort of bridge between
the radiant and the shadowy-sinister. And when we come to the animals,
almost anything goes. If the lion does not exactly lie down with
the lamb, the hypogryph seems to be on friendly terms with the domestic
cat, the monkey with the swan, the hound with the sphinx. Not to
mention intermediary forms, in which an owl has human features,
or a bull grows feathers to fly with. Why should they not regard
the air as their medium quite as much as earth, in the world of
gravitas without gravity?”
|